Circle had its worst day as a public company on Tuesday. CRCL fell 20%, erasing $5 billion in market cap on volume nearly 4x its 90-day average. Coinbase dropped 11% in sympathy.
The catalyst: a new draft of the CLARITY Act that would ban passive yield on stablecoin balances. Since 95.5% of Circle’s revenue comes from interest on USDC reserves, the market treated the bill as an existential threat.
Bernstein, the Wall Street research firm with a $190 price target on CRCL, thinks the market is reading it wrong. The question is whether a 20% haircut on an already volatile stock is a rational repricing or a gift.
However, the CLARITY Act might be the best thing that ever happened to Circle’s margins.
In this issue, we’ll go over:
- The issuer vs. distributor distinction that Bernstein says the market is botching, and why the bill’s real target is Coinbase’s leverage, not Circle’s revenue
- The $908 million question: how Circle’s revenue-sharing deal actually works, why it likely renews in five months, and what a few points of margin improvement means at scale
- Our own bottom-up valuation using Citi’s stablecoin TAM, actual Fed dot plot data, and Circle’s reported financials, with bear, base, and bull scenarios
- Why AI agent payments and Circle’s own blockchain sit outside the model entirely, but could rewrite the multiple
Grab the limited-time offer!
Subscribe to read the rest.
Get a 2-week free trial
Renews at $25/month
UpgradeWhy serious investors subscribe:
-
Clear thinking during macro regime changes
-
Fewer trades, better decisions
-
Avoiding one bad allocation often matters more than finding one great trade
